Friday, December 9, 2016
Greg Lake's dead at 69, so that bums this out a bit:
Then again, he's bumming everyone out with the lyrics anyway.
I just wanna know why the opening shot doesn't show him playing a 12-string, since he's obviously playing a 12-string in the opening.
Thursday, December 8, 2016
New Deal Demoncrat - it's beginning to look a lot like inflation. Which actually isn't good, as he notes at the end:
Typically over the last 60 years, the Fed has chased inflation at this stage, and causes a yield curve inversion, as "real" wages stall and decline, heralding a recession.
Which then throws everyone out of work. And then you're left with a Republican government which responds by cutting spending, sending the US deeper into recession.
Unless, of course, they're only against deficit spending when Democrats are in charge. We'll have to see.
And by the way: can anyone with smarts explain if the CPI Shelter component is just a function of the mortgage rate? Because the big stink in the 70s (that manufactured a pile of inflation that wasn't there) was that owner-equivalent rent started to be calculated based on present value of a mortgage with interest.
I suspect CPI Shelter is a useless piece of data.
Wednesday, December 7, 2016
I'm studying "math for economists" for a Saturday night exam. Yes, an exam on Saturday night.
Tim Duy the Economics Guy - desperately searching for a new strategy. Quote:
Politicians, aided by economists, have long ignored the negative impacts of trade-induced structural change. Indeed, they have even cheered it on. After all, the process “releases resources” for use in other, more productive parts of the economy. Those workers are just “low-skilled” workers. The US needs more “high-skilled” workers anyway.
Fact: Workers hate being referred to as “low-skilled.”
How we respond to Trump is important. If we simply fall back on our standard numbers, we lose. If we confidently predict that TPP is a big win because it will add 0.5% to GDP by 2030, we lose. If we just use this as an opportunity to reiterate the importance of a college degree, we lose. We have been doing this for decades, and it helped deliver Trump to office.
The speed of regional labor market adjustment to shocks is agonizingly slow in any area that lacks a critical mass of population. Rural and semi-rural areas remain impacted by negative shocks for at least a decade, but often longer. Relative to life spans, in many cases the shocks might as well be permanent.
And note that this is not just about negative trade shocks. Trade is an easy punching bag for Trump, but his message carries wider because we are really talking about structural shocks in general.
Trump is speaking to all of these workers, not just the trade-impacted workers. And you can complain that they don’t matter, they aren’t high-skilled workers, that the economy is shifting away to urban areas, that they should just move. In the rural Oregon case, you can add in that the big (and labor-intensive) trees were almost gone anyway, that technology was taking over at the logging site and at the mill, that falling transportation costs meant you didn’t need to mill locally.
None of that works because all you are doing is telling people they have no value relative to the lives they knew.
We don’t have answers for these communities. Rural and semi-rural economic development is hard. Those regions have received only negative shocks for decades; the positive shocks have accrued to the urban regions. Of course, Trump doesn’t have any answers either. But he at least pretends to care.
Just pretending to care is important. At a minimum, the electoral map makes it important.
He even gets in a few kicks at Krugman, who to be truthful has been a bit of a leftie bitch since Trump won the election. I mean, he calls the Carrier deal a "descent into banana republic governance", and "government as protection racket", without understanding that the US voted precisely for a government that would destroy anyone who attacked the livelihoods of the working class.
Well, you have to admit it, Trump is actually going out and doing things.
WaPo - opinion on the Carrier deal. And this is the bit that's interesting:
Now comes Donald Trump — in the public mind, a successful businessman — who as the new president, suddenly declares that the new norm is no longer acceptable, and he intends to do whatever he can to shame and punish companies that abandon their workers. It’s one thing for a company to sustain a few days of bad headlines in the local newspaper when it decides to close a facility. It’s quite another when the president of the United States is not only willing, but from a political point eager, to make a federal case out of it. Suddenly, maximizing shareholder value no longer provides the political and social inoculation that it used to.
He knows that he and his new commerce secretary will have to engage in a few more bouts of well-publicized arm twisting before the message finally sinks in in the C-Suite. He may even have to make an example of a runaway company by sending in the tax auditors or the OSHA inspectors or cancelling a big government contract. It won’t matter that, two years later, these highly publicized retaliations are thrown out by a federal judge somewhere. Most companies won’t want to risk such threats to their “brands.” They will find a way to conform to the new norm, somewhat comforted by the fact that their American competitors have been forced to do the same.
Just as much as changes in the law, this is how norms of business behavior are changed.
Economists study changes at the margin, and if Trump can save the marginal job, then that should work out well for employment.
And with employment already at the supposed "full employment rate", that'll mean wage increases for the working class, and if that starts passing through into inflation, then Yellen can raise interest rates.
Which will then throw those same people out of work, but whatever.
Of course he's bribing companies to keep jobs in the US, but the US government has been giving free money to corporations for decades anyways. May as well make part of the kick tied to jobs, right?
at 2:39 PM
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Invictus - Seattle minimum wage update. Long story short, raising the minimum wage doesn't cause unemployment, because
1. there are feedback effects that mean the higher-paid plebs can now spend more, and
2. employers pay their employees far, far less than their marginal product of labour.
Greg Mankiw would admit this stuff if he was an economist, instead of a rentawhore grifter for the Republican party.
Monday, December 5, 2016
There's nothing so much like a goldbug as a cat kicking himself in the face:
Sunday, December 4, 2016
OMG BREAKING NEWS
According to Zerohedge, Renzi just lost his referendum, which will mean heightened uncertainty in Italy and imminent Italian banking sector contagion. Because obviously when Renzi lost the referendum, everyone in the country decided to leave their jobs and go home.
As Business Insider adds, ermagerd the Euro has collapsed in thin overnight trade.
Oh also gold went up $10 for a sec but then went back down.
Sorry, Zerohedge, but I think this is going to be faded by morning, and all your stupid typing was for naught. Your fifteen minutes of dooooom will just make you look stupid, yet again, in the long run.
You should maybe concentrate more on your Russian-funded disinformation campaign about western NGOs secretly conspiring to help refugees enter Europe.
OK, exam time is upon me, so I really should quit the bullshit and start studying.
I was doing really badly around October, but it turns out I was just suffering from life-threatening encephalopathy, no big. I've since pulled my marks up and have a chance for 3 A+es, and I have a lot of study time because my last 2 exams are on the 22nd, so I may as well try to do my best, right?
So, in case you miss reading a lot of stuff, why not bookmark some essays on the history of geology, metallurgy, and precious metals from a professor at UC Davis:
Essays on Geology and History
The section on the high middle ages is good.